<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comparing Keyword Research Tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.searchwizmarketing.com/marketing-tactics/comparing-keyword-research-tools/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.searchwizmarketing.com/marketing-tactics/comparing-keyword-research-tools</link>
	<description>Web Marketers talk shop, nerd out at the SEO Watercooler</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 11:29:54 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: namewiz</title>
		<link>http://blog.searchwizmarketing.com/marketing-tactics/comparing-keyword-research-tools/comment-page-1#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>namewiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 05:13:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Informative article. Impressed you conducted a small scientific experiment to compare results from Google, KD and WT. We&#039;d assume that Google would be most accurate - and most often updated...my gut tells me that is accurate and it is backed up by the fact that I&#039;ve met w/ the higher ups at KD several times and they are very vague about where they get their data and how old it is. 

Another thing I&#039;m sure you&#039;ve noticed with KD and WT is that there are some really goofy results that show high search counts - things that would NEVER have that many searches - like 25 searches for &#039;plumber crack good joke site&#039; on a search for &#039;plumber&#039;. ...It&#039;s obvious that there is no way that long tail got so many searches in 1 monthl. You don&#039;t find THAT kind of ridiculousness in Google in my experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Informative article. Impressed you conducted a small scientific experiment to compare results from Google, KD and WT. We&#8217;d assume that Google would be most accurate &#8211; and most often updated&#8230;my gut tells me that is accurate and it is backed up by the fact that I&#8217;ve met w/ the higher ups at KD several times and they are very vague about where they get their data and how old it is. </p>
<p>Another thing I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ve noticed with KD and WT is that there are some really goofy results that show high search counts &#8211; things that would NEVER have that many searches &#8211; like 25 searches for &#8216;plumber crack good joke site&#8217; on a search for &#8216;plumber&#8217;. &#8230;It&#8217;s obvious that there is no way that long tail got so many searches in 1 monthl. You don&#8217;t find THAT kind of ridiculousness in Google in my experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
